Confirmed : s there a new deal? Marcus Rashford should defy Manchester United's decision to keep him
Manchester United are expected
to offer Marcus Rashford a new
contract, but he should leave
while he still can.
Despite the World Cup being held
in Qatar, which has been marred
by allegations of bribes, slave deaths,
and boycott threats, it is a tournament
that England footballers cannot
afford to miss.
Following their semi-final appearances
in Russia and the Final of the Euros
last year, momentum and logic would
suggest that England have a good
chance of winning it all.
They have a seasoned tournament
manager, one of the finest attackers
in the world, and incredible squad
depth (in most areas, anyway).
Not being in this England squad
would mean missing out on the country's
greatest chance of winning a World
Cup since 1966.
That will worry Marcus Rashford. He
has been a near-constant in Gareth
Southgate's squad for nearly five years but was
left out of the most recent round of
internationals.
Time for Marcus Rashford
to leave his comfort zone
There have been numerous theories
as to why Marcus Rashford's form
has dipped so significantly for United
this season.
He doesn't work hard enough; he's
just not that good; he should have
STUCK TO FOOTBALL; he's been
injured; it's the manager's fault; it's Cristiano
Ronaldo's fault; it's the club's fault;
etc.
Many of those elements, like others
, will have played a role. But there's
no denying that his form has
deteriorated, and he wasn't deserving
of a spot in the England squad.
He had 36 goal assists in 57 games
last season, but only seven in 26 this
season. He's having trouble, as are
most United players.
Old Trafford has been described as
a jail, with United players weathering
captivity in the knowledge that the
rep's time in the foreign service will
arrive soon enough.
The thick shirts with three lions emblazoned
on them that David Beckham wore
now include a red devil to weigh
Rashford and his teammates down.
Both Marcus Rashford and his teammate
Luke Shaw, who indicated this week
that he prefers playing for England
over United, are expected to be granted
new long-term contracts.
United's hierarchy considers them part
of a 'critical group of core players' they
want to preserve. And, in a pathetically
typical move from the club, they are
willing to proceed with those contracts
without the agreement of the incoming
permanent manager.
Rashford should not sign the contract.
He only has to look at what has occurred
to Jesse Lingard, who forfeited his
chance to compete in the World Cup
by staying at United.
Rashford, on the other hand, may
not be in the same boat. The new
manager may immediately reintegrate
him into the club, assigning them
him to a position and playing style
that he prefers.
He could return to the England squad
if he scores a lot of goals at the start
of next season. But it's also possible
that the new manager may not gel with
him and will bring in new players,
putting Rashford out in the cold after
signing a lucrative new contract.
The new United manager can give
Marcus Rashford all the assurances
he wants. But when it comes to the
crunch – poor form, a lack of goals,
whatever – that new boss is less
likely to be in Rashford's corner.
Rashford's departure from United
will be difficult. As a professional footballer
, the club is all he's ever known,
and leaving creates uncertainty
on several levels.
He'd be better off upping sticks
to get to the World Cup with England;
in this case, the greater unknown is at home.
Comments
Post a Comment